Subscribe Or Listen
Get each show automagically by clicking the iTunes badge. Or download Juice, right-click the Feed badge, then copy/paste the link into Juice.
Good Karma
Shelly
- Digg/leopardgrrl1
- Flickr/shellyspodcast
- Twitter/shelly
- YouTube/shellyspodcast
- Wishlist/Shelly
- Skype/sbrisbin
- AIM/catterwall
- GMail/Shelly
- page/404
- page/1065
- page/11846
- Blog/Shelly
- Get your own Widget
Archives
- January 2005
- February 2005
- March 2005
- April 2005
- May 2005
- June 2005
- July 2005
- August 2005
- September 2005
- October 2005
- November 2005
- December 2005
- January 2006
- February 2006
- March 2006
- April 2006
- May 2006
- June 2006
- July 2006
- August 2006
- September 2006
- October 2006
- November 2006
- December 2006
- January 2007
- February 2007
- March 2007
- April 2007
- May 2007
- June 2007
Contact
shellyspodcasts at gmail dot com
Voicemail line: 206-339-6055
Visit my web site
Friends, Familia, and Alter Egos
- The Big Show
- Borderline
- Cheap Date Show
- The Darcy and Holly Show
- Dry Shave
- Plan Nine Rock show
- Podcheck Review
- PotterCast
- Quirky Nomads
- The Redboy Podcast
- Radio Adventures of Dr. Floyd
- Radio Detective Story Hour
6/15/2005
4 Comments:
Hi Shelly,
Great podcasts here. I have a podcast too at http://scottspaulding.blogspot.com and the feed is at http://feeds.feedburner.com/scottspaulding.
Hi Shelly,
First of all, let me say that I enjoy your podcasts. Keep up the great work!
I fear that, perhaps, I was a bit hard on you this morning on the blindcasting list. I am just a little concerned about the use of the term "accessibility". To me, that term means the technology is usable by as many people as possible, including those of us with disabilities. Accessibility for the partially sighted or visually impaired is, most certainly, not the end of the story. Even if a piece of software works with "reverse video" which I now realize is a configuration setting not a screen magnification application, that absolutely, most certainly does *NOT* mean that it is at all accessible. It just means you can change the program's display characteristics and use your magnification software to make the pictures and text bigger. It could still represent a nightmare for those of us whom happen to be really blind, depending on screen readers like JAWS, VoiceOver or Window-Eyes in order to use the software on our computers! That's all. I'm quite confident you understand exactly what I am talking about, but, I fear it doesn't come across clearly in your blog, mailing list messages or podcasts.
Again, for the benefit of all, the ability to "reverse video" or make the displayed screens bigger does *NOT* equal accessibility!!!
I don't believe I *ever* excluded screen reading from my discussion of
accessibility. In fact, it was the primary topic of my commentary on
Adam Curry's show, and that was for a very specific reason. Screen
reader users represent both a larger fraction of the disabled
community, and one that is most easily understood by the people and
companies we're trying to influence toward greater accessibility.
Also, the high price of third-party screen readers on Windows
represents an opportunity for Apple to convert blind people into Mac
users (their business interest) and provides blind people with a
cost-effective alternative (our interest). I mention my own use of
reverse video because I feel that it is an overlooked accessibility
feature in iTunes specifically, and in other parts of Windows as well.
It also happens to be an area in which Windows and the Mac OS have
finally made great strides after many years of shoddy efforts. I talk
about what I know and what my experience tells me is an easy oversight
to correct.
In short, don't diminish the accessibility tools I need, and I won't
diminish the ones you need. We should all be working together.
-shelly
Oh Soctt, you say the sweetest things. I'm glad to have you on board.
Post a Comment
<< Home